Letter: Navy should consider more on Growler increase

Editor,

In response to the proposed increased number of Growler planes and training flights, residents of Whidbey Island have proposed scaling back their numbers, or relocating them, for many important reasons: unhealthy levels of noise, reduction of available housing, safety issues near populated area with schools and hospitals, decreased property values and invasion of the quiet, natural experience of Deception Pass, public beaches and historic areas of Island County.

There are two other important issues I believe should be considered by the U.S. Navy decision makers in advancing their mission to defend our nation. The first issue concerns the unique infrastructure challenges of an island in the event of a natural disaster. Our recent power outage experience should be a wake-up call highlighting this concern. Imagine if we and the Naval base experience a prolonged lack of water, electricity, and the loss of Deception Pass Bridge due to an extreme windstorm, earthquake or tsunami.

Scientists have warned that we are overdue for a large scale natural disaster. A subduction of the Juan de Fuca plate up against the North American plate would cause a tsunami-driven wall of water likely to be tens or even hundreds of feet higher than any structure at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.

A second issue for this island-located base is vulnerability to a terrorist attack. The Deception Pass Bridge, our only road exit on or off Whidbey, is old and vulnerable to those bent on destruction. Much of the island water supply comes from a pipe under the bridge. In addition, the Navy base is located near heavily traveled public roads, impossible to monitor for bad actors, and it is bordered by accessible navigable waters.

One of the Navy’s first considerations in locating facilities or expanding an operation should be its vulnerability to events that could curtail or eliminate its operations. It seems logical to me that a more sparsely populated area less vulnerable to natural disasters and easier to guard against attack would be a high priority in siting new or expanded training facilities.

Dave Anderson

Freeland

More in Opinion

Editor’s notes: Still pursuing the facts in the age of coronavirus

While I’m normally not a big fan of Facebook, candy or long… Continue reading

Pandemic bringing major changes to your newspaper

Social distancing. Stay-at-home order. Coronavirus. COVID-19. Pandemic. A day doesn’t go by… Continue reading

Extraordinary measures during extraordinary times

With each day — with each passing hour, in fact — we’re… Continue reading

Rockin’ a Hard Place: Love in the time of coronavirus

Last weekend, as I have for the past three years, I volunteered… Continue reading

Sound Off: Navy’s proposal would be unfair to city rate payers

“We are negotiating amongst partners who want to get to an equitable… Continue reading

In our opinion: Common sense is a good defense against coronavirus

Nobody can say definitively if, or when, the coronavirus will spread to… Continue reading

Guest commentary: The process of choosing presidential delegates is changing

By John Amell The way in which political parties nominate presidential candidates… Continue reading

In Our Opinion: Options for controlling utility rates likely limited

Oak Harbor council members didn’t adopt a plan to raise city utility… Continue reading

City should stand firm in sewer negotiations with Navy

Oak Harbor officials had yet another financial surprise regarding the new sewage… Continue reading

Sound Off: Built to last, and well worth a million bucks

Living in Central Whidbey, I have always thought that having all those… Continue reading

In our opinion: Holland Happening may have changed, but name should not

Oak Harbor Chamber of Commerce leaders learned that a tulip called by… Continue reading