Editorial: I-1634 will prevent a sugar tax , vote ‘yes’ in November

  • Tuesday, October 9, 2018 1:08pm
  • Opinion

Big taxes were one of the tools successfully used to discourage tobacco use over the last few decades. And Initiative 1634 aims to accomplish much the same thing by taxing sugar.

In the case of cigarettes, it made sense. In the case of sugar, however, it does not.

Vote “yes” on I-1634.

The measure would prohibit local governments from imposing any new taxes or fees on grocery items. Taxes on groceries were already soundly rejected by Washington state voters a number of years ago.

Sponsors argue that I-1634 will protect working families.

Granted, given that the top donors behind the initiative are the Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo and Red Bull North America, that argument is a bit disingenuous. These companies are opposed to a tax that would affect sugary drinks the most.

Everyone understands such a tax might discourage people from drinking liter after liter of pop.

Studies show that sugar is the biggest culprit behind the obesity crisis. It’s a health crisis that not only shortens lives and impacts life quality, but it has a huge economic toll on society.

At first glance, it might seem that a sugar tax would force companies that thrive in a nation of obesity to take some responsibility.

Ultimately, though, the decision about what we put into our bodies, and our children’s bodies, should remain our own, not government’s, local or otherwise.

More in Opinion

Pandemic bringing major changes to your newspaper

Social distancing. Stay-at-home order. Coronavirus. COVID-19. Pandemic. A day doesn’t go by… Continue reading

Extraordinary measures during extraordinary times

With each day — with each passing hour, in fact — we’re… Continue reading

Rockin’ a Hard Place: Love in the time of coronavirus

Last weekend, as I have for the past three years, I volunteered… Continue reading

Sound Off: Navy’s proposal would be unfair to city rate payers

“We are negotiating amongst partners who want to get to an equitable… Continue reading

In our opinion: Common sense is a good defense against coronavirus

Nobody can say definitively if, or when, the coronavirus will spread to… Continue reading

Guest commentary: The process of choosing presidential delegates is changing

By John Amell The way in which political parties nominate presidential candidates… Continue reading

In Our Opinion: Options for controlling utility rates likely limited

Oak Harbor council members didn’t adopt a plan to raise city utility… Continue reading

City should stand firm in sewer negotiations with Navy

Oak Harbor officials had yet another financial surprise regarding the new sewage… Continue reading

Sound Off: Built to last, and well worth a million bucks

Living in Central Whidbey, I have always thought that having all those… Continue reading

In our opinion: Holland Happening may have changed, but name should not

Oak Harbor Chamber of Commerce leaders learned that a tulip called by… Continue reading

Sound Off: Holland Happening name is a cherished tradition

By Autumn Sundown During 2019, Oak Harbor’s iconic and beloved Holland Happening… Continue reading