Letter: Tourism money should be spent elsewhere


We agree with the In Our Opinion published on Aug. 28 advocating for eliminating public spending on tourism marketing. The tourism marketing professionals will present you with increasingly complicated analytics to justify their funding. The reality is, with Whidbey Island’s popularity and proximity to the population centers of Puget Sound, tourists will visit whether you spend $1 or $1 million on marketing.

The question is: How do you equitably distribute the costs and benefits of these visitors?

In Langley, 2019 lodging tax revenue was about $173,000. Island County Tourism was paid $44,000 for marketing. The Langley Chamber of Commerce (a private nonprofit) was paid $60,000, along with a subsidized lease, to operate a tourist office and provide tourism marketing. With the notoriety of Langley and advances in technology, a taxpayer-funded tourist office is no longer necessary.

Using social media, individual businesses and organizations more effectively market what Whidbey Island has to offer, and on a more personal level. Taxpayer-funded tourism marketing is no longer necessary.

With a limited budget the City of Langley needs to prioritize. Affordable housing and public infrastructure should be two of the highest priorities.

This money can be used for affordable workforce housing. “In addition, 2015 legislation (SB 1223) also allows cities and counties to (optionally) use lodging tax revenues to repay general obligation bonds or revenue bonds for affordable workforce housing,” according to the Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington.

This money can be used for public infrastructure projects that benefit all users. Imagine better maintenance and access to parks and beaches, or a real restroom at Seawall Park rather than an unsightly port-a-potty. The possibilities are many.

Contact Mayor Scott Chaplin (mayor@langleywa.org) and the city council (council@langleywa.org) and let them know it’s time for the tourism fund to give back to the community and be used for affordable housing and public infrastructure.

If Langley continues to be a vibrant small town that is cherished and frequented by locals, tourists will want to visit. If it works only to create a place for tourists, the locals will stop coming. What sort of place do you want to live in?

David and Holly Price


More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Pledge will neither help nor hinder board’s work

Editor, Discussion about the Pledge of Allegiance is a recent topic of… Continue reading

Letter: Vote for school board that doesn’t want to edit the past

South Whidbey’s school board election has become a referendum on whether our… Continue reading

Opposition to vaccine, masks is truly selfish

Editor, This is a difficult letter for me to write on 9/11.… Continue reading

Thanks to those who attended ice cream social

Editor, Thank you Whidbey News-Times (and South Whidbey Record) and reporter Kira… Continue reading

Letter: Story on hospital audit findings misleading

Editor, A recent Whidbey News-Times article reported on WhidbeyHealth’s financial submissions to… Continue reading

Letter: Story on Girl Scout project was welcome

Editor, I want to thank you for the Aug. 25 article describing… Continue reading

Letter: Oak Harbor Music Festival is a favorite Whidbey event

Editor, I want to express thanks to the organizers and the army… Continue reading

Letter: We need to take better choices in picking candidates

Editor, A recent opinion piece in the New York Times concludes that… Continue reading

Letter: Residents should support local journalism

Editor: I applaud the South Whidbey Record for their Opinion in Saturday’s… Continue reading

Letter: City of Oak Harbor leaders have dubious priorities

I just finished reading the Aug. 24 letter from Terry Lacey and… Continue reading

Letter: Candidate forums will be on Zoom this October

Editor, Election Day is Nov. 2. The deadline for our county’s Election… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Best of luck’ to writer who dismisses masks

Editor, Congratulations to Mr. Wilferth for being such an expert in epidemiology… Continue reading