Letter: Navy withheld info on water contamination


The Navy found PFAS chemicals in water coming from its base more than a year ago – but didn’t reveal all that were found. Neither did it disclose that it knew, nine months ago, PFASs had seeped to portions of the aquifer.

In October of last year, the Navy announced that two PFASs had been found in Clover Valley Creek and Lake. However, it was not until October 2019, a year later, that reports were posted on a Navy website showing that six PFASs had actually been found — in every monthly sample from September 2018 to September 2019.

PFAS chemicals don’t break down but accumulate in the body and are linked to health problems, including cancer. There are 114 properties in the Clover Creek and Lake area where water is still used for irrigating and, until news of contamination, watering cattle. The Creek and Lake empties to Dugualla Bay and a salmon restoration area.

The two PFASs the Navy first admitted to finding in the surface water were, PFOA and PFOS. But, also found, in every sample taken from September 2018 through September 2019 were PFHXS, PFHXA, PFHPA, and PFBS—the same “forever chemicals” found in Coupeville’s drinking water now being filtered at the Navy’s expense.

The Navy has been quick to say that contaminated surface water doesn’t mean groundwater is contaminated. But buried within the Navy’s websites are summaries of test results from January 2019 showing the contamination of three Clover Creek area wells with PFOA, PFHXS and/or PFBS. The most contaminated well owner didn’t receive results until October 21, 2019.

Withholding such information denies people opportunities to protect themselves. They could avoid exposures, ask for cleanup, or insist that the Navy replace PFAS containing firefighting foams that caused the contamination.

Most wells sampled don’t show contamination, but all wells haven’t been sampled and PFASs are still seeping to the aquifer—and still discharging to Dugualla Bay and the Straight of Juan DeFuca, public waters classified by the state as “extraordinary” for aquatic life uses, protected shellfish harvesting, and threatened and endangered species.

Rick Abraham


More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Navy failing to follow through with promises

Editor, Quite a few years ago, during the Environmental Impact Statement 106… Continue reading

Letter: NAS Whidbey has led the way in cleaning up contaminants

Editor, The Jan. 7 letter to the editor of the Whidbey News-Times,… Continue reading

Letter: Donation of feminine products helping women

Editor, In the 10 short months since “I Support The Girls-Whidbey Island”… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Deranged screed’ wrong, Americans are suffering

Editor, You recently published a deranged screed from a local Trumpster. He… Continue reading

Letter: Congress must act to prevent war

Editor, The United States and Iran are poised at the edge of… Continue reading

Letter: We need a centrist candidate

Editor, I’d like to float the idea of purposefully voting for a… Continue reading

Letter: Members of Congress must abide by oath to uphold law

Editor, I was mystified by Timothy Hazelo’s letter to the editor in… Continue reading

Letter: Navy should clean up its mess for the next generation

Editor, There has been a lot of news about the PFAS in… Continue reading

Letter: Influence of the NRA is dominating U.S. politics

Editor, I begin this response by asserting that I agree with most… Continue reading

Most Read