Letter: Growlers weren’t ‘here first’ as some are claiming

Editor,

Whidbey Island residents who don’t recognize the problem with the Growlers tell the rest of us, “The Navy was here first, and you signed an acknowledgement when you bought property here.”

However, the Navy wasn’t “here first.” Predating them is every Whidbey Islander older than 77; before any other people came here, there were the Native Americans; before them was the land and the wildlife. But for now, let’s pretend the Navy was here first. Does that mean they can do anything they want?

Suppose you buy property in a neighborhood that has a Home Owners’ Association (HOA).

The HOA specifies that dogs are allowed. Your property is adjacent to someone who has lived there for 77 years; the day after you move in he buys a big, aggressive dog. He says he needs the dog for protection. He even says the dog will protect the entire neighborhood.

However, several times a week, this dog comes onto your property and attacks and bites you.

Your neighbors — the ones who AREN’T getting bitten — argue, “He was here first, and that dog protects all of us, and you signed an acknowledgement that dogs were allowed, so stop complaining.”

That’s the situation with the Growlers. They are attacking the ones they claim to defend. They are harming our people.

Why is the “shut-up-or-leave” crowd ignoring that fact? Must we destroy our citizens in order to protect them?

I’m not saying “Close NASWI.”

I’m just asking the Navy to be a good neighbor to Whidbey, as Whidbey has been to the Navy.

Put a restraint on this attack dog. And frankly, this request has the rule of law on its side: the U.S. Constitution.

In America, the military obeys the people.

Allowing it to be the other way around invites military dictatorship.

Steve DeHaven

SMSgt, USAF (Ret.)

Coupeville

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Message of Martin Luther King Jr. is being distorted

Editor, Invoking Martin Luther King Jr. in the name of “colorblindness” is… Continue reading

Letter: Do something more worthwhile with sports field

Editor, I would like to propose a use for the land that… Continue reading

Letter: Wonders if call to hotline led to a quieter night

Editor, Last week, after a Growler jet made a very loud pass… Continue reading

Letter: Book illustrates risk that Marxism presents to U.S.

Editor, I recently subscribed to Whidbey News-Times. On only my second issue,… Continue reading

Letter: Aircraft training is vital to safety of crews, others

Editor, Opposition to Navy flight training use of Outlying Field Coupeville citing… Continue reading

Letter: Berry is a fitting representative of the United States

Editor, This is in response to Fred Wilferth’s letter to the editor… Continue reading

Letter: Fox News about the only network presenting facts

Editor, Why on earth would you folks print a political cartoon demeaning… Continue reading

Letter: Website long written off as an unreliable source

Editor, I would like to point out to letter writer Elizabeth Guss… Continue reading

Letter: Citizen interests not represented by a ‘clique’

Editor, When I read last Saturday’s edition of the South Whidbey Record,… Continue reading

Most Read