Letter: Fasten your seatbelts, hang on to checkbooks


We all recently received our Notice of Value from Island County Assessor Mary Engle. Included with this notice, a slip of yellow paper explains, “The legislature requires identification of land and improvements separately on assessment notices, however, only the total assessed value should be considered and based on state law only the total assessed value may be appealed.”

This is something new for this year and it is not correct. It is based on misinterpreted precedence of case law; specifically University Village v King County, 2001.

This case deals only with the income method of real property assessment which is mainly applicable to some commercial properties.

The state Board of Tax Appeals initiated this misinterpretation recently to simplify their administrative procedures.

Justice it is not.

When I called the county Assessor’s Office, the deputy assessor explained that the assessor’s valuation total was accurate, but that improvement valuations were assessed too low and land assessments too high. Why did my land value increase by 20 percent from last year?

All of my neighbors have land values in increments of $50,000. Is that an indication of the lack of accuracy in land assessments?

I have emailed our newest state legislator Rep. Dave Paul with the hope that he can request a state attorney general opinion to clarify interpretation of University Village v King County.

Assessment of Island County real property is far too simplistic and, therefore, inaccurate. When I asked to meet with Engle, the response was, “The assessor’s value is accurate.”

There was no agreement to meet.

There is no adjustment to land values for view quality, orientation, parcel size and encumbrance restrictions, such as wetland or eagle habitat, off-site septic, Navy aircraft noise, paved driveway, extensive landscaping, gazebo, as well as other attributes that we all realize influence market value.

Appraisal methodology is required to be in writing and transparent to the public. It is neither.

We just re-elected Engle, who ran unopposed. Fasten your seatbelts and hang on to your checkbooks.

Tim Verschuyl

Oak Harbor

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Navy failing to follow through with promises

Editor, Quite a few years ago, during the Environmental Impact Statement 106… Continue reading

Letter: NAS Whidbey has led the way in cleaning up contaminants

Editor, The Jan. 7 letter to the editor of the Whidbey News-Times,… Continue reading

Letter: Donation of feminine products helping women

Editor, In the 10 short months since “I Support The Girls-Whidbey Island”… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Deranged screed’ wrong, Americans are suffering

Editor, You recently published a deranged screed from a local Trumpster. He… Continue reading

Letter: Congress must act to prevent war

Editor, The United States and Iran are poised at the edge of… Continue reading

Letter: We need a centrist candidate

Editor, I’d like to float the idea of purposefully voting for a… Continue reading

Letter: Members of Congress must abide by oath to uphold law

Editor, I was mystified by Timothy Hazelo’s letter to the editor in… Continue reading

Letter: Navy should clean up its mess for the next generation

Editor, There has been a lot of news about the PFAS in… Continue reading

Letter: Influence of the NRA is dominating U.S. politics

Editor, I begin this response by asserting that I agree with most… Continue reading

Letter: So many suffer from Trump Derangment Syndrome

Editor, The “pro-impeachment rally draws crowds,” piece in the Dec. 21 Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Article falls short of representing hospital

The Whidbey News-Times article of Dec. 17, titled “Hospital ponders adding new… Continue reading

Letter: More than ever, climate change facts important

Editor, In response to my letter to the editor Wednesday, Nov. 6,… Continue reading