Letter: Contract concerns drive hearing examiner decision


In reading the Saturday, June 8, article in the Whidbey News-Times and South Whidbey Record, it appeared as if the Board of Island County Commissioners was looking to instruct the hearing examiner on how to interpret the Island County Code and ordering his dismissal for not following the board’s instructions.

This was not the context of the conversation, nor the direction of the board.

This board has not asked, or will ever ask, the hearing examiner to advise the county on how to write code to obtain a specific outcome. Nor will this board insert itself into or try to influence a hearing examiner’s decision.

We simply wanted to take advantage of his experience in helping us identify areas to focus our energies as we continue our policy improvements.

In the past, the hearing examiner has noted instances where Island County code is silent or conflicting during his independent review of a land-use application. This silence or ambiguity in the code inevitably leads to a frustrated hearing examiner, frustrated stakeholders and an easily appealable decision.

These appeals are costly to both the applicant and the county and fundamentally the board desires a clear and transparent land-use process; and that all hinges on having a well-written code.

With that in mind, in 2015, as part of the hearing examiner’s signed contract, he agreed to “provide the planning director with a bimonthly report detailing code conflicts and propose new code language to be considered for addition to the Island County Land Development standards as part of an on-going effort to eliminate unnecessary ambiguity and inconsistency in the Island County Code, and generally improve code provisions and regulations.”

This service was not provided.

We respect, and in-fact rely on, the independent role of a hearing examiner. Keeping that independence intact is an important part of our land-use process.

Equally important is holding our contractors accountable to perform their agreed-upon duties.

This is part of the fiduciary responsibility the board owes to the public and the reasoning behind the desire to seek a new hearing examiner.

Jill Johnson

Island County Commissioner

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Challenges of enjoying single-use plastics

Editor, Penn Cove. For many, these words are associated with beautiful sunrises,… Continue reading

Letter: NAS Whidbey has led the way in cleaning up contaminants

Editor, The Jan. 7 letter to the editor of the Whidbey News-Times,… Continue reading

Letter: Navy failing to follow through with promises

Editor, Quite a few years ago, during the Environmental Impact Statement 106… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Deranged screed’ wrong, Americans are suffering

Editor, You recently published a deranged screed from a local Trumpster. He… Continue reading

Letter: Donation of feminine products helping women

Editor, In the 10 short months since “I Support The Girls-Whidbey Island”… Continue reading

Letter: Congress must act to prevent war

Editor, The United States and Iran are poised at the edge of… Continue reading

Letter: We need a centrist candidate

Editor, I’d like to float the idea of purposefully voting for a… Continue reading

Letter: Members of Congress must abide by oath to uphold law

Editor, I was mystified by Timothy Hazelo’s letter to the editor in… Continue reading

Letter: Navy should clean up its mess for the next generation

Editor, There has been a lot of news about the PFAS in… Continue reading

Letter: Influence of the NRA is dominating U.S. politics

Editor, I begin this response by asserting that I agree with most… Continue reading

Letter: So many suffer from Trump Derangment Syndrome

Editor, The “pro-impeachment rally draws crowds,” piece in the Dec. 21 Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Article falls short of representing hospital

The Whidbey News-Times article of Dec. 17, titled “Hospital ponders adding new… Continue reading