Feeling misled, he will vote no

The “Yes on Whidbey PUD” group insists if the PUD vote passes, their first task will be to have an independent study done to determine if a PUD is really feasible and viable. At a League of Women Voters forum, I asked the PUD representative why they had not asked the county commissioners to fund a feasibility study with a relatively small tax levy before voting to establish the PUD. This would put off establishing a PUD with its independent taxing and bond issuing authority until the public had been fully and independently informed.

The PUD representative responded and told the audience he had discussed the matter with “commissioners” (plural) and had been told the commissioners would not be interested in such a study at present. Therefore, the “Yes” group went forward with the petition and the ballot measure. The audience appeared satisfied with the answer – it appeared their elected representatives had been consulted. The indication was the county commissioners would not act so the “Yes” group went forward independently.

The audience was misled by that answer. When questioned after the forum, the PUD speaker admitted an error in his statement: “Did I say commissioners? I meant commissioner.” He had not spoken before “commissioners” (plural) as he had told the audience. He had spoken “informally to a commissioner (singular), who is a friend of mine” and that individual indicated the commissioners would probably not be interested. The commissioner reportedly spoken to was not identified.

So, there we are. The PUD group has presented us with a “tailored for Whidbey” study they did with unidentified experts and tell us the initial levy they will impose will be minimal – “the cost of a couple of lattes.” The three PUD commissioners will have the authority to tax at the rate of 45 cents a thousand. The candidates insist they will not do this – “trust us.” One candidate went so far to say, “Recall us if we do.”

I don’t know if a PUD would be a feasible and viable course of action for Whidbey because I still haven’t seen an independent feasibility study. Indeed, one of the prospective PUD commissioners stated some doubt on his part that a PUD would be viable. Unintentionally or not, I was misled by their forum speaker. I also don’t appreciate candidates who, in effect, take the road of “trust us or recall us.” I will vote “no.”

Bruce Williams

Coupeville

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Island needs, deserves quality local health care

Editor, I will be voting yes for the hospital district levy increase… Continue reading

Letter: Proposition is crucial to maintain WhidbeyHealth

Editor, Hospitals are as important to a community as other major services… Continue reading

Letter: Hoffmire presents brighter, newer vision for city

Editor, We live outside the Oak Harbor city limits, so we can’t… Continue reading

Letter: Coupeville school challengers have partisan agenda

Editor, Ward Sparacio, a candidate for Coupeville School Board, says in his… Continue reading

Letter: Diamond, Mann understand complex job

Editor, I’m writing in support of Erik Mann and John Diamond for… Continue reading

Letter: School challengers embrace a dangerous fallacy

Editor, In following the local school board election, I was particularly struck… Continue reading

Letter: Our hospital deserves the full support of voters

Editor, I urge everyone of voting age with a pulse to vote… Continue reading

Letter: Hospital proposition crucial for health of community

Editor, Hospitals are as important to a community as other major services… Continue reading

Letter: Write in Fleming for Langley council

Editor, Write in Gail Fleming for Langley City Council, Position 5. We… Continue reading

Most Read