Bailey doesn’t know science


At a recent candidates’ forum the candidates were asked about climate change and what they would do about it. Barbara Bailey talked positively about legislation dealing with climate change that passed during her tenure in Olympia. Listening to her one would think that she either introduced or sponsored the legislation, or, at a minimum, had voted for it. But, alas, that is not the case. This is classic Barbara Bailey ­— taking credit as a member of the Legislature for the passage of legislation without disclosing to her constituents how strenuously she opposed its passage. In fact, if pushed and not allowed to give an evasive, nonresponsive answer, Bailey will deny the existence of climate change. Denying the validity of overwhelming scientific evidence does not change reality. Stated differently, deliberate ignorance of the problem does not make it disappear.

Yet, at the candidates’ forum, Bailey asserted that it is important that she “have a seat at the table” to address measures to deal with the issue. That’s just what we need — someone sitting at the table who does not even recognize the existence of the problem. To give Bailey a seat at the table for such imperative discussions, after what we know about her environmental voting record (a lifetime score of only 39 percent by the Washington Conservation Voters), will only add to the harm already caused by her partisan disdain for legitimate science.

We don’t need an obstructionist sitting at “our” seat at the table; we need someone at the table who recognizes and appreciates the validity of the science underlying the reality of global climate change. As a life-long nurse, Patricia Terry is schooled in science and has made innumerable life and death decisions on the basis of scientific principles. We all deserve a representative who will not blindly ignore reality because it may benefit a certain constituency.

Public policy must be based on the true facts, not on distorted or ignored facts skewed to support a particular partisan agenda. We need someone who has the intellect to understand the complexities of the science that impacts every aspect of our lives, and the integrity to act in the public interest. Regrettably, Barbara Bailey fails on both counts. Patricia Terry epitomizes intelligence and integrity.

Mary K. Sandford, Ph.D.


More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Pledge will neither help nor hinder board’s work

Editor, Discussion about the Pledge of Allegiance is a recent topic of… Continue reading

Letter: Vote for school board that doesn’t want to edit the past

South Whidbey’s school board election has become a referendum on whether our… Continue reading

Opposition to vaccine, masks is truly selfish

Editor, This is a difficult letter for me to write on 9/11.… Continue reading

Thanks to those who attended ice cream social

Editor, Thank you Whidbey News-Times (and South Whidbey Record) and reporter Kira… Continue reading

Letter: Story on hospital audit findings misleading

Editor, A recent Whidbey News-Times article reported on WhidbeyHealth’s financial submissions to… Continue reading

Letter: Story on Girl Scout project was welcome

Editor, I want to thank you for the Aug. 25 article describing… Continue reading

Letter: Oak Harbor Music Festival is a favorite Whidbey event

Editor, I want to express thanks to the organizers and the army… Continue reading

Letter: We need to take better choices in picking candidates

Editor, A recent opinion piece in the New York Times concludes that… Continue reading

Letter: Residents should support local journalism

Editor: I applaud the South Whidbey Record for their Opinion in Saturday’s… Continue reading

Letter: City of Oak Harbor leaders have dubious priorities

I just finished reading the Aug. 24 letter from Terry Lacey and… Continue reading

Letter: Candidate forums will be on Zoom this October

Editor, Election Day is Nov. 2. The deadline for our county’s Election… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Best of luck’ to writer who dismisses masks

Editor, Congratulations to Mr. Wilferth for being such an expert in epidemiology… Continue reading