There’s no ‘fault’ in role U.S. played in nuclear history

Editor,

To the apologetic letter writer who thinks we should “admit guilt and end this madness” in discussing the development/use of nuclear weapons, I ask, “Guilt for what?” Finally bringing World War II to an end?

Saving millions of American and Japanese lives? Avoiding war (nuclear deterrence) with the Soviet Union/Russia for over 70 years?

First, no U.S. President wants or has wanted to drop a nuclear weapon. President Truman made the hard but wise decision to drop “Little Boy” on Hiroshima because he thought it would cause the Japanese to surrender and save millions of lives that would be lost in the planned invasion (“Operation Downfall”) of the Japanese homeland.

Unfortunately, the Japanese were too stubborn and we had to drop a second one to cause them to capitulate. In case the letter writer is unfamiliar with history, the second bomb, nicknamed “Fat Man,” was not originally targeted for Nagasaki, but due to bad weather, the crew decided to hit one of the alternative targets which was an industrial complex. To imply that the crew zeroed in on a Catholic church is sheer folly.

Had the Japanese not surrendered after the Nagasaki drop, the U.S. planned to invade Kyushu first (“Operation Olympic”) and subsequently Honshu (“Operation Coronet”), which would have cost millions of lives on both sides, since the Japanese would have fought to the last man to defend their homeland.

I’m sure the writer has heard of Teddy Roosevelt’s motto, which is just as true today as it was back in the 1900s, “Speak softly and carry a big stick.” That is exactly what President Trump is trying to do today: Always conduct diplomatic discussions first (with the use of the military as the last resort), but in order for diplomacy to be successful, you have to have a strong military (including nuclear weapons) to back it up.

POTUS is working on building our military back up after it was badly neglected by the last administration.

Fred Wilmot

Oak Harbor

More in Opinion

SOUND OFF: Will island residents join in celebrating Earth Day?

Island County enjoys the valuable assets of our beaches and lagoons where… Continue reading

Article shows why there needs to be competition

Editor, Health care has been a big issue in westernized countries for… Continue reading

Does everyone now need to be armed?

Editor, The last two issues of the Whidbey New-Times have printed Ed… Continue reading

Environment is big factor in gun control discussion

Editor, On and on the arguments rage about the Constitution’s Second Amendment… Continue reading

Climate change not due to man, but part of God’s plan

Editor, The coordinated backlash against Commis-sioner Rick Hannold regarding “climate change” by… Continue reading

Housing project may be a win for downtown Oak Harbor

Over the decades there have been dozens of plans for revitalizing downtown… Continue reading

Protect your Second Amendment rights

Editor, In response to Larry Larson’s excellent letter “If one Constitutional right… Continue reading

Hannold’s ‘cherry picked’ logic raises concern

Editor, In reference to Commissioner Rick Hannold’s April 4 editorial, I was… Continue reading