Letters to the Editor

Hospital needs to stabilize finances | Letters


Opinions on Whidbey General Hospital’s $50 million bond bring various views. Some opponents vote against any Whidbey General measure and others don’t want additional taxes.

Bond supporters are divided between those who vote “yes” for anything the hospital wants while others see a yes vote as beneficial to the community.

I see Whidbey General as a facility providing needed community services. But this construction bond should not be supported until WGH becomes financially viable.

From 2010 through 2012 WGH operated at a financial loss with the approximate values being: 2010 = $721,000, 2011 = $3.1 million and 2012 = $2.2 million.

So, how’s 2013? It’s critical that voters go to WGH’s website and read August’s commissioners’ meeting minutes. June brought a loss of $1.6 million. Add the $2.1 million lost January through May and WGH has lost $3.7 million the first half of 2013.

Commissioner Gardner reminded everyone that June’s $1.6 million loss is not the complete picture and CEO Tom Tomasino noted that it will be December before we will know the year’s revenue.

That’s right. Because of problems with the new Meditech software package the hospital’s financial status won’t be known until year’s end. Also in the August meeting minutes you’ll read “Terry Litke, CFO reported that due to the slow down and cash back we are talking with Whidbey Island Bank for a line of credit.”

As hospital district residents we have the obligation to support facility maintenance and operations. Major new construction projects must be funded within a financially healthy district. Our hospital has a four-year history of continuing financial loss and is now preparing to open a line of credit in order to meet operational obligations.

Whidbey General leadership has to reverse this financial nosedive before support of a construction bond can be considered.

Tom Leahy


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the Mar 28
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates