Letters to the Editor

Bond passes, doubts remain

With many self-congratulations the voters have passed approval for a school building bond issue. Questions that must be asked:

1. If, as Superintendent Schulte has stated, an architect must be hired and plans made, how then does anyone know what the costs will be without a specification, a design or a plan of construction and operation?

2. What added costs does this venture entail in continuous operation?

3. What are the limitations imposed by taking on a 40 year old design to be modified to unknown dimensions, i.e. making the school a prisoner of that 40 year old design?

4. Were any alternatives considered to the suggested changes in the building -- if there is no architect, etc., how is it possible to have a sound idea of practical development?

5. Will choosing an architect, etc., be on a competitive basis, and who will guide the competition?

These and other questions really ought to be answered and I pose them not to be of adverse mind, but because several hundred million dollars I have been charged with managing in industrial construction throughout my career. I know that not answering them before they become important is the only way to make sure things are done right.

S. M. Harris

Oak Harbor

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the Oct 26
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates