Feedback: Expert contradicts own advice


July 3, 2008 · Updated 10:17 PM 

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

I would like to clarify the comments of Roger Brooks, the Oak Harbor City Council’s tourism consultant, in the recent edition of the Whidbey News-Times. A waterfront hotel was the concept of a company called Chandler and Brooks, in a 1998 tourism grant, from the State of Washington. Roger Brooks was a partner of Chandler and Brooks. His company got paid $25,000, then, for his idea — a waterfront hotel.

Now, five years later, Roger Brooks is saying that he doesn’t like a waterfront hotel, and that it is a bad idea. He got paid $49,000 this time for his idea.

So, after $25,000 then, and $49,000 now, we the people of this community are at the mercy of another out-of-town consultant who knows best. That’s $74,000 of knowing what is right for our community. Smells fishy to me. It also seems like the city council is gullible for falling into the trap.

About the only thing we have gotten, from this last go-round from the out-of-town expert, is another bill.

George Churchill

Oak Harbor

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.

blog comments powered by Disqus