War: We could have won in Vietnam
July 3, 2008 · Updated 9:31 PM
I have heard, again, infernal references to the possible war with Iraq being another Vietnam. In Vietnam, 54,000 brave Americans lost their lives. It was a war that could have been won quickly. Gen. Paul D. Harkins, commanding general of U.S. Forces in Vietnam, stated: The faster you move in a war, the fewer casualties there are and the sooner the fighting is over. This war could be won in less than three months, but not the way it is being fought now.
Anyone who believes that American fighting men were defeated in Vietnam is wrong; they were defeated at home, said W.T. Grant, a helicopter pilot who regularly flew into the jaws of death.
Gen. Nathan F. Twining, Adm. A. Burke, Gen. George H. Decker, Gen. Frederick H. Smith Jr., Gen. Thomas S. Power, Lt. Gen. Ira C. Eaker, and Lt. Gen. Arthur G. Trudeau stated in a letter, The war against North Vietnam can be irrevocably won in six weeks.... The war may go on for another five, ten or more years if it continues to be fought as at present.... We are fighting a war in a weak-sister manner that is unprecedented throughout the history of military science.
This war, if fought, wont be lost by our military. If it is another Vietnam, it will be because of our politicians and supporting communist sympathy.
Scott Vanderlinden
Oak Harbor
Comment on this story.
So keep your comments:
- Civil
- Smart
- On-topic
- Free of profanity
We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.
