Political signs should be limited


October 9, 2012 · Updated 3:43 PM 

While driving through parts of six states last month (GA, MD, DE, PA, IL and WI), I was surprised to find that in the countryside there were few or no campaign signs.

The leaves were turning and the forests and farms were beautiful. Returning to Whidbey Island, I realized that our county’s roads have been visually polluted by thousands of campaign signs.

We enjoy fall colors, but not the garish campaign signs that are everywhere. Campaign signs begin to appear in the spring and proliferate into late fall – longer than the Major League Baseball season.

They collectively use a lot of resources and energy, are unsightly, and, at the end of the season, provide several tons of non-recycled waste for the landfills.

These signs provide the name of a candidate, party affiliation and no more: do they really convey meaningful information about the candidate’s platform or experience?

It is time to establish limits for the number of signs, their size, and length of time allowed before an election.

Grant Heiken

Freeland

 

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.