Taxes didn’t close Ford


July 3, 2008 · Updated 8:44 PM 

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

Reading the News-Times from afar, I was quite amused to read the Feb. 6 letter by Mr. Hewitt blaming the local sales tax rate as a contributor to the closure of Oak Harbor Ford. As of January 2008, the rate in Oak Harbor is four-tenths of a penny higher than Anacortes, slightly less than Snohomish County and about a half penny less than King County.

It is nowhere near the “highest in the state.” Thus, on the purchase of a $25,000 automobile, the tax paid in Oak Harbor is $100 more than the same purchase in Anacortes or Burlington and about $50 less than one bought in Everett.

We are not going to speculate why people shop where they do. It’s a personal choice. We are saddened to see a major auto dealership leave Oak Harbor, but nationwide, the “Big Three” U.S. auto makers are closing and consolidating dealerships. It’s a sign of the times, especially for the Ford Motor Company, which wishes to eliminate nearly half of its dealerships.

Making an unsupported and emotional case that it’s due to taxes is pure horse-puckey.

Ardy and Al Fragola

Paros Island, Greece

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.

blog comments powered by Disqus