Ethics Board looks at fine line around lobbyist meetings | Petri Dish

Amid the dialectic contours in Olympia, they are trying to figure out if influence can be peddled with a few bags of Doritos or a $12 meal.

Amid the dialectic contours in Olympia, they are trying to figure out if influence can be peddled with a few bags of Doritos or a $12 meal.

A panel empowered to guide elected leaders along a righteous path is struggling to draw clear ethical boundaries for lawmakers when dining and drinking with lobbyists.

State lawmakers are allowed to “accept gifts in the form of free food and beverage on infrequent occasions” if it’s related to their official duties. But existing law doesn’t define “infrequent.”

Pressure to come up with a definition arose following revelations that a handful of legislators regularly dined on lobbyists’ dime during the 2013 session.

Several of them may have done so while collecting taxpayer-funded per-diem payments, according to research compiled by reporters for a public radio station and Associated Press.

The Legislative Ethics Board, a panel of lawmakers and legal minds, is trying to provide clarity on the rules, but members are thus far unable to agree on whether “infrequent” should be defined in terms of a specific number of meals.

Also, they are wrestling with what exactly constitutes a meal and at what point must lawmakers report them. Right now, legislators must report whenever they are treated to meal worth more than $50.

That brings us back to a recent meeting of the Ethics Board and a confession from Rep. Drew Hansen, D-Bainbridge Island, that a bag of Doritos can be a meal for him.

He wanted to know how many bags of Doritos a lawmaker can accept from a lobbyist before it becomes a meal that must be reported as a gift.

The answer he got from the board counsel was that it’s not crystal clear, but if he gets $50 worth all at once, it likely needs to be declared.

That didn’t sound like a problem to Hansen, who endorsed limiting lawmakers to an average of one free meal per week and to report those exceeding $5 in value.

Such a course of action didn’t set well with other panel members, who contended it restricted lawmakers’ ability to interact with lobbyists too much and created potentially burdensome reporting requirements.

During the public hearing portion of the meeting, one lawmaker argued those kinds of changes would undermine the ability of citizen legislators to serve.

State Rep. Matt Manweller, R-Ellensburg, told the panel that dining with a lobbyist may be the only time someone of his limited financial means can learn nuances of bills.

He said he was offended at the notion he could be “influenced by a $12 hamburger” and worried the ethics panel would “create a system where rich people sit down with other rich people” to dictate legislation.

A citizen Legislature means “even poor and middle-class people get to sit down with lobbyists,” he said. “I sometimes get asked to go to four dinners a night.”

“My big fear is not that I’m going to get influenced, it’s that I’m going to get fat.”

The Legislative Ethics Board will continue its discussions in August.

Political reporter Jerry Cornfield’s blog, The Petri Dish, is at www.heraldnet.com Contact him at 360-352-8623 or jcornfield@heraldnet.com

 

More in Opinion

Cartoon for Sept. 22, 2018

Cartoon for Sept. 22, 2018… Continue reading

Letter: Has the Navy looked at impact on Sound’s orcas?

Editor, Knowing how deeply the increase in OLF flights off Central Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Oak Harbor Key Club’s Trivia Night is nearing

Editor, I am writing this letter in regards to our First Annual… Continue reading

Letter: Democracy depends on exercising right to vote

Editor, Tuesday, Sept. 25 is National Voter Registration Day. Across the nation,… Continue reading

Climate lobby makes strong case for supporting Initiative 1631

Asking people to vote to increase the cost of a gallon of… Continue reading

Cartoon for Sept. 19, 2018

Cartoon for Sept. 19, 2018… Continue reading

Letter: Sharpe’s Corner a job well done

Editor, There was a good bit of opposition when the Washington State… Continue reading

Letter: A poor design for the big trucks

Editor, As one who spoke up against the roundabout traffic circle plans,… Continue reading

Letter: Letter writer is not an expert, Navy is

Editor, I think the U.S. Navy knows a bit more about the… Continue reading

Most Read