Editorial: Plug sales tax leakage

  • Wednesday, January 3, 2007 4:00pm
  • Opinion

The economic development community has a new catch phrase it’s been bandying about in recent months: sales tax leakage.

Such leakage occurs when Island County residents travel elsewhere to do their shopping. On North Whidbey, most of this leakage takes place at the huge shopping malls and big-box stores in Burlington and Bellingham, while on South Whidbey the leakage occurs in Everett and Lynnwood.

The idea is to stop this leakage, and that’s a good idea. Island County dollars spent elsewhere means tax revenues generated by those dollars are spent elsewhere. Skagit County, for example, uses money spent by Island County residents for its own transit services, police needs and other government necessities. Meanwhile, back on Whidbey Island, local governments are losing significant funding when residents spend their money elsewhere.

The problem is obvious, but the solution sought by the economic development community is not a good one. The idea is to plunk a Fred Meyer or Costco onto some rural acreage outside of Oak Harbor, thereby compelling more islanders to shop locally.

This is bad for two reasons: First, it destroys the rural lifestyle that is Island County’s main selling point to tourists and businesses. And two, the strategy is bound to fail. No matter how many strip malls and big box stores are allowed on Whidbey Island, the shopping will always be greener on the other side of the bridge or ferry route.

What is needed is sales tax equalization. This is hardly a news flash. Islanders have been working toward this goal for years in Olympia. Simply calculate how many dollars islanders spend off-island, and then have the state kick back those tax revenues to the local community. That way, Skagit County or Snohomish County wouldn’t be getting our tax dollars.

The big counties don’t like the idea of losing money, of course. But there are larger issues at stake. Certain counties such as Island are designated “rural” by the state. It should be a state priority to keep these counties rural, and that means letting them keep their own tax dollars. Besides, the amount of money islanders spend in Skagit and Snohomish counties is chicken feed to them, but not to us. It’s only right that we be allowed to keep the money.

The Legislature convenes next week in Olympia. Sales tax equalization should be a top priority for the 10th District’s delegation, and county, city and town officials should work hard to help them achieve this goal. It will help keep Island County rural while providing desperately-needed tax dollars to our local communities. It doesn’t get any more “win-win” than that.

More in Opinion

Island Transit should start charging bus fares

Island Transit doesn’t really have much of a choice when it comes… Continue reading

Creating yet another tax in city is a bad idea

Creating a new tax to fund road improvements in Oak Harbor is… Continue reading

It’s time to consider running for office

It’s time for those who’ve entertained the idea of running for elected… Continue reading

Letter: Affordable housing development is needed

Editor, Oak Harbor has worked successfully to ensure that we enjoy a… Continue reading

City should cut instead of taxing

Editor, Oak Harbor considers creating a taxing district for roads (April 28… Continue reading

Growlers are not good for business

Editor, Whidbey Island and our neighboring islands and towns rely on tourism… Continue reading

We should be thankful Navy is treating water

Editor, I understand the concern regarding water quality addressed in Rick Abraham’s… Continue reading

Pro-gun rally was lawful, notice given in advance

Editor, In response to an “open question” from David Wright, Freeland, published… Continue reading

Consider giving to vets’ center

Editor, Combat Veterans on Whidbey Island lack easy access to professional counseling… Continue reading