Opinion

Paid leave requirement would add to expenses

By Erin Shannon

During this legislative session, lawmakers in the House of Representatives considered two bills that would require employers to offer paid leave to workers.

HB 1313 would require employers with five or more employees to pay employees for five, seven or nine days of sick leave per year, depending on the size of the company. This bill passed the House and will now be considered by the Senate.

HB 2238 would require employers with more than 24 employees to offer up to three weeks of paid vacation for employees that work an average of 20 hours per week. This bill did not survive the committee cut-off and is considered dead this session.

Although one of the bills is dead this session, it is instructive to understand how much these paid leave mandates would cost employers.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average cost to an employer for paid sick leave is 25 cents per hour per employee. The average cost for paid vacation is a steeper $1.02 per hour. Taken in isolation, one might think those numbers seem reasonable.

Lawmakers may think they’re being generous by forcing employers to change personnel policies and that it won’t cost businesses too much, but looking at the numbers in aggregate, those seemingly negligible costs add up quickly.

There are 1,713,831 workers in Washington businesses with 25 or more employees. Nationally, 23 percent of private-sector workers do not receive paid vacation, so that would be approximately 394,181 Washington workers who might benefit from the paid vacation mandate. Assuming the national average of 1,700 hours worked per year, multiply by $1.02 per hour, and the cost to employers in our state for paid sick leave would be a mind-boggling $684 million every year.

Taken together, that would be an increase in the cost of doing business in Washington state of more than $1.1 billion per year. Of course, employers cannot simply absorb an extra $1.1 billion every year. They will be forced to shift costs back on to workers, eliminating non-mandated benefits and reducing hours, and to consumers in the form of increased prices.

Washington should be especially wary, as our new business start rate has declined while our failure rate continues to increase.

In 2010, Washington ranked ninth in business starts and 11th in closures. In 2011 (the most recent year data is available), Washington slipped to 12th for new business starts and seventh for closures. So entrepreneurs are opening fewer businesses, and more of them are failing, as compared to other states.

Adding $1.1 billion per year in labor costs to our state’s job creators is not the way to reverse this disturbing trend.

Erin Shannon is the director of the Center for Small Business with the Washington Policy Center, an independent, nonpartisan think tank promoting sound public policy based on free-market solutions.

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Sep 13 edition online now. Browse the archives.