Election 2004: Library site stunts growth


July 3, 2008 · Updated 11:35 PM 

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

Initially, I want to state my support for a larger, more capable library for Oak Harbor/North Whidbey residents. After considering the planning for the current bond issue, however, there are several important reasons I cannot support it.

Based on information provided by library representatives at the public meeting on August 17, at Island County’s assessors office, the current library plan is not adequately considering taxpayer cost, future growth and site location problems.

For example, why should taxpayers pay over $2 million more to have a library located in already one of the most congested areas of town? How will the library expand in the future; as we all know will be required. Why does the proposed library budget already include hundreds of thousands more for the downtown property than the county assessor’s estimated/assessed value? Check to see who owns the property and the adjacent area.

Library representatives stated new books for the library are included in the budget, but no line item identifying this was in the $12 million budget provided at the public meeting. This significant cost was brushed aside with the comment that the book funding was in there somewhere.

No financing or long term planning was conducted which considered the old city maintenance yard, near downtown, as a library site. This site was simply disregarded when the city staff stated that the site needed environmental cleanup. Certainly it does, but what does that cost? I think much less than $2 million, but nobody even bothered to evaluate this objectively!

In summary, I respect and applaud the enthusiasm and dedication of the library planning committee. Their recommendations are not, however, based on objective facts and appear to have been influenced and altered for reasons other than the taxpayer’s best interests, through political interests.

Hopefully, the taxpayers will be provided a future opportunity to approve a bond issue much less costly that has inherently significant growth potential in its design and location.

Ginny Jones

Oak Harbor

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.

blog comments powered by Disqus