A solution to nightclub noise | Editorial


July 12, 2011 · Updated 3:04 PM 

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

The siting of the Element nightclub on Bayshore Drive across a large condominium complex occupied mostly by the elderly was always a head-scratcher. The conditional use permit for the late-night establishment was granted by the prior administration and council, and the present city leaders have had to deal with the fallout.

A number of stipulations were included in the conditional use permit, and to his credit the Element’s owner has followed them all. The ambiance of the nightclub has even changed, from a hard-driving dance hall to a slightly more subdued gambling, drinking and dancing establishment.

Still, nothing has soothed the neighbors who complain not so much about the operation of the nightclub itself, but of the noisy patrons who leave in the wee hours of the morning in a cacophony of yelling and loud laughter, with the occasional fight and rare gunshot thrown in. According to testimony at a recent hearing to review operations at the Element, neighbors living in the condos were primarily concerned about noise emanating from the parking lot between 1 a.m. and closing time at 2 a.m.

Residents have purchased noise canceling machines, closed their windows on warm, stuffy nights, and no doubt resorted to ear plugs, but nothing solves the problem.

Oak Harbor police keep a close eye on the proceedings but can’t arrest a single person in a noisy crowd for violating the noise ordinance. It’s too hard to prove who’s responsible, according to Police Chief Rick Wallace. What would reduce noise is the physical presence of a police office and cruiser in the parking lot as people leave the nightclub. There’s nothing more sobering than a confronting a police officer when leaving a drinking establishment.

An officer and cruiser should be placed smack dab in the middle of the Element’s parking lot every weekend night around closing time for a while. Patrons will quickly get the message, and then it can be done only occasionally as a reminder.

The cost should be shared by the nightclub owner, whose establishment causes the problem, and the city, which never should have allowed such a use in a location so close to a residential complex and city park. The residents have suffered enough. It’s time for the city to take strong action to restore peace and quiet to the community, even if it costs some money.

 

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.

blog comments powered by Disqus