Wright’s fight heads to Thurston County

Wright’s Crossing LLC is continuing its fight against the Board of Island County Commissioners by filing a petition for judicial review in Thurston County Superior Court.

The developer is challenging the decision of the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board to dismiss two motions filed by the developer.

Wright’s Crossing is challenging the commissioners’ decision to exclude the developer’s application from the 2018 planning commission docket. In March, the hearings board dismissed the developer’s appeal as well as its motion for reconsideration.

The new petition states the hearings board “focused on the discretion related to granting an application, not the non-discretionary requirements” to docket the application. The attorney representing Wright’s Crossing argues the commissioners had an obligation to docket the application, which asked for an expansion of Oak Harbor’s urban growth area (UGA).

The expansion of the UGA would be one of many steps required to allow for the needed density to build the proposed 1,500-home development. Inclusion of the developer’s application would require the county to do a buildable lands analysis; one completed in 2016 determined there was enough vacant property within Oak Harbor’s UGA to allow for 20 years of growth. The 2016 analysis was one of the reasons the commissioners gave for excluding the application.

The petition argues that the Growth Management Act requires the county to re-evaluate the buildable lands analysis because it claims the previous one used “an unrealistically low market factor” and thus was inaccurate. Commissioners have said the state is in the process of releasing new guidelines for performing buildable lands analyses, and this contributed to the decision to not docket in 2018.

“The docketing delay allows the housing crisis to get worse,” the petition states.

Wright’s Crossing is also appealing a decision by Skagit County Superior Court to dismiss its complaint for statutory and constitutional writ of review and the alternative complaint for declaratory relief.

The judge dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled.

More in News

Man admits stealing from ice cream store

A 27-year-old man admitted to stealing from a Langley ice cream shop… Continue reading

Community Harvest feeds togetherness

Everyone is family at the North Whidbey Community Harvest’s Thanksgiving dinner. For… Continue reading

Coupeville holding annual potluck

n It’s time to eat some turkey, pour the gravy and give… Continue reading

Oak Harbor’s sewage plant up and running

Coupeville sludge helps kick start new facility

Beware of people seeking personal info to fix ballot

Voters who had an issue with the signature on their ballots should… Continue reading

Coalition’s big fundraiser Sunday at Greenbank Farm

The Whidbey Homeless Coalition is in the midst of one of its… Continue reading

Hits lead to drop in WhidbeyHealth Sept. revenue

WhidbeyHealth suffered an unplanned budget hit, making September “not such a good… Continue reading

Man charged with making threat

An assault was reported at a Clinton house that was the site… Continue reading

Photo by The Everett Herald / 2016
                                Todd Morrow
Island Transit board names choice for executive director

Island Transit’s board of directors picked as its new executive director an… Continue reading

Most Read