Wright’s fight heads to Thurston County

Wright’s Crossing LLC is continuing its fight against the Board of Island County Commissioners by filing a petition for judicial review in Thurston County Superior Court.

The developer is challenging the decision of the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board to dismiss two motions filed by the developer.

Wright’s Crossing is challenging the commissioners’ decision to exclude the developer’s application from the 2018 planning commission docket. In March, the hearings board dismissed the developer’s appeal as well as its motion for reconsideration.

The new petition states the hearings board “focused on the discretion related to granting an application, not the non-discretionary requirements” to docket the application. The attorney representing Wright’s Crossing argues the commissioners had an obligation to docket the application, which asked for an expansion of Oak Harbor’s urban growth area (UGA).

The expansion of the UGA would be one of many steps required to allow for the needed density to build the proposed 1,500-home development. Inclusion of the developer’s application would require the county to do a buildable lands analysis; one completed in 2016 determined there was enough vacant property within Oak Harbor’s UGA to allow for 20 years of growth. The 2016 analysis was one of the reasons the commissioners gave for excluding the application.

The petition argues that the Growth Management Act requires the county to re-evaluate the buildable lands analysis because it claims the previous one used “an unrealistically low market factor” and thus was inaccurate. Commissioners have said the state is in the process of releasing new guidelines for performing buildable lands analyses, and this contributed to the decision to not docket in 2018.

“The docketing delay allows the housing crisis to get worse,” the petition states.

Wright’s Crossing is also appealing a decision by Skagit County Superior Court to dismiss its complaint for statutory and constitutional writ of review and the alternative complaint for declaratory relief.

The judge dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled.

More in News

Coupeville hosts Sustainability Fair Wednesday

Those with questions about almost anything green — saving energy, conserving water,… Continue reading

Port to tighten leash on dogs roaming free at wharf, Greenbank farm

The Port of Coupeville is cracking down on unleashed dogs and will… Continue reading

Man accused of cyberstalking, harassing former girlfriend

A man is accused of cyberstalking for allegedly threatening a South Whidbey… Continue reading

Person stuck in tree | Island Scanner

The following were among the calls made to the Island County Sheriff’s… Continue reading

Whidbey Queer Pride Parade postponed

May be canceled this year, organizers say

Chapman completes basic training

U.S. Air Force Airman SHASTA C. CHAPMAN, the daughter of Micheal Chapman,… Continue reading

Photo provided
New ensign saluted by grandfather

AEC (AW) Doug Warren presented his granddaughter, Ensign Katie Kirkwood, with her… Continue reading

Oak Harbor island’s third ‘Civility City’

Oak Harbor joined Langley and Coupeville as Whidbey’s third “Civility City.” On… Continue reading

Coupeville ferry temporarily at one boat later this month

A complicated confluence of considerations means a cut in service for the… Continue reading

Most Read