Profiled pooch owners may be able to appeal breed-based dog bans in their cities

  • Tuesday, February 5, 2019 5:02pm
  • News
Even though two-year-old Maggie is a beloved pet, she is subjected to breed-based discrimination in municipalities that ban pit bulls. Proposed legislation would make allowances for well-behaved canines regardless of pedigree. Photo by Tessa Kriechbaumer

Even though two-year-old Maggie is a beloved pet, she is subjected to breed-based discrimination in municipalities that ban pit bulls. Proposed legislation would make allowances for well-behaved canines regardless of pedigree. Photo by Tessa Kriechbaumer

By Emma Scher

WNPA Olympia News Bureau

Cities that ban certain dog breeds would have to provide an appeal process for owners under proposed legislation that makes exceptions for good dogs of outlawed pedigree.

According to DogsBite, a nonprofit organization that advocates for victims of dog maulings, 28 cities in Washington have ordinances that restrict or ban ownership of pit bull terriers, or declare the entire breed as “potentially dangerous” or “dangerous.”

House Bill 1026 originally aimed to prohibit a ban on specific dog breeds in local jurisdictions. But a substitute bill that passed through committee on Thursday would still allow the breed bans, but requires jurisdictions to implement an appeals process.

“People make dogs dangerous, dogs aren’t born dangerous,” said prime sponsor Rep. Sherry Appleton, D-Poulsbo. “It’s discriminatory to tell someone that they can’t live in your town because of the member of their family.”

Through the appeals process, specific dogs may be exempt from the regulations if they pass a canine behavioral test. If the dog passes, it would be exempt to possession prohibitions for two years, and subject to a retest to maintain the exemption. If the dog fails the test, it may retake the test within a reasonable period of time.

Representative Jenny Graham, R-Mead, voted yes on the bill as it stands now, but does support local jurisdictions being able to create breed-based bans.

“At one and a half I was bitten by a German shepherd—I bear the scars still—eight times in the head and face. I’m lucky to be alive, and that was a German Shepherd,” said Rep. Graham. “With the bigger dogs that are capable of hurting or killing there needs to be some protection there.

The bill was voted out of committee 8-2 with a “do pass” recommendation, and has not been scheduled for a floor debate

More in News

Law could prohibit eye tattoos in Washington state

By Madeline Coats WNPA Olympia News Bureau State lawmakers aim to prohibit… Continue reading

Mixed bag: Pair of bills seeking to ban plastic

While there is support for a statewide ban on plastic shopping bags… Continue reading

Law would eliminate personal objection to vaccines in Washington state

By Madeline Coats WNPA Olympia News Bureau A proposed bill would eliminate… Continue reading

Health educator giving Nepal presentation March 2 in Coupeville

Coupeville United Methodist Church is inviting the community to learn about Nepal.… Continue reading

Filmmaker to lead lectures at several Whidbey locations

Sno-Isle Regional Libraries is presenting a series of lectures by the creator… Continue reading

Writer includes Whidbey trails in his latest book

Feeling cooped up after a week of snow but don’t know where… Continue reading

Island residents earn academic distinction

The following Whidbey Island residents earned academic distinction during the most recent… Continue reading

New program connects social worker with law enforcement

Law enforcement officers aren’t social workers. But most days, they respond to… Continue reading

Over the moon: Musselfest launches events season

This year, she’s over the moon. The Penn Cove Musselfest mermaid, that… Continue reading

Most Read