Wrights Crossing would lower property values

Editor,

I am clearly in opposition to Wright’s Crossing. But I decided to imagine what our island would be like if the Nevada developer pulled off the mystical affordable housing development.

I design and build homes everyday. I price the costs of homes and all of their supplies and labor expenses. Here is what I come up with:

The Nevada developer claims to sell small basic affordable homes for $250,000 as per the articles written in the paper. The average listing on Whidbey Island for a 2,000-square-foot, three bedroom home is $375,000.00. Based upon the formulas described in articles from the Nevada developer, I believe he would sell similar-sized homes in Wright’s Crossing for $350,000.00. This is a very impressive number. It also seems like it is amazingly affordable and would draw buyers from all areas to be here.

But what does it mean for the current 2,000 -square-foot homeowners of Whidbey Island? Well, it means you just lost $25,000 per household. When you decide to sell your existing home, you will now have 200-plus comparable sized homes that just sold for $25,000-plus less than what you could have sold it for before Wright’s Crossing existed. The banks and appraisers value homes sold close in size, location and amenities.

The tens of thousands of residents that live near Oak Harbor will lose equity from their home every time a home sells in Wright’s Crossing. The more homes that are sold in this affordable housing development the more the appraiser has a comparable home to decrease the value of yours.

If you are a homeowner and you support this development, it will indirectly cost you a fee of $25,000 in the loss of value of your home.

I am a huge supporter of affordable housing. Through condominiums, townhomes and city infill, it can be done to provide affordable housing to those who need it. I am not a supporter of creating a development that takes away property value to the current homeowners of Whidbey Island to make an out of state developer wealthy.

Scott Hampton

Coupeville

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Japanese understand impact of Navy jet noise

Editor, The Jan. 9, 2019 edition of The Asahi Shimbun News reports… Continue reading

Letter: Description of crime was unnecessary, damaging

Editor, Regarding the Jan. 16, 2019 article, “Man kills his ex-girlfriend, calls… Continue reading

Letter: Citizens’ job is to ensure elected representativs are doing theirs

Editor, Is the southern border situation a national emergency or a tempest… Continue reading

Letter: Volunteers for treasurer’s office are invaluable at tax time

Editor, The Island County Treasurer’s Office wishes to extend its annual thanks… Continue reading

Letter: Writer’s information is propaganda, not facts

Editor, In your Dec. 26, 2018 edition of the Whidbey News-Times, you… Continue reading

Letter: Distract, don’t talk about investigation, is a strategy

Editor, I believe President Trump nailed it when he said he prefers… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Angel lady’ who turned in lost purse new best friend

Editor, In early December, I had a quick errand at Walmart, parked… Continue reading

Letter: Storm should have been front, center on page one

Editor, It is obvious where the Whidbey News-Times’ priorities are when the… Continue reading

Letter: League of Women Voters, AAUW legislative brunch open to public

Editor, Much has been said about the renewed interest in government in… Continue reading

Most Read