Wrights Crossing would lower property values

Editor,

I am clearly in opposition to Wright’s Crossing. But I decided to imagine what our island would be like if the Nevada developer pulled off the mystical affordable housing development.

I design and build homes everyday. I price the costs of homes and all of their supplies and labor expenses. Here is what I come up with:

The Nevada developer claims to sell small basic affordable homes for $250,000 as per the articles written in the paper. The average listing on Whidbey Island for a 2,000-square-foot, three bedroom home is $375,000.00. Based upon the formulas described in articles from the Nevada developer, I believe he would sell similar-sized homes in Wright’s Crossing for $350,000.00. This is a very impressive number. It also seems like it is amazingly affordable and would draw buyers from all areas to be here.

But what does it mean for the current 2,000 -square-foot homeowners of Whidbey Island? Well, it means you just lost $25,000 per household. When you decide to sell your existing home, you will now have 200-plus comparable sized homes that just sold for $25,000-plus less than what you could have sold it for before Wright’s Crossing existed. The banks and appraisers value homes sold close in size, location and amenities.

The tens of thousands of residents that live near Oak Harbor will lose equity from their home every time a home sells in Wright’s Crossing. The more homes that are sold in this affordable housing development the more the appraiser has a comparable home to decrease the value of yours.

If you are a homeowner and you support this development, it will indirectly cost you a fee of $25,000 in the loss of value of your home.

I am a huge supporter of affordable housing. Through condominiums, townhomes and city infill, it can be done to provide affordable housing to those who need it. I am not a supporter of creating a development that takes away property value to the current homeowners of Whidbey Island to make an out of state developer wealthy.

Scott Hampton

Coupeville

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: St. Clair has right skills to be elected commissioner

Editor, Janet St. Clair demonstrated that she is well prepared to be… Continue reading

Letter: I-1639 would put data, 2nd Amendment, at risk

Editor, Vote “no” on Initiative 1639. Did you know that I-1639 allows… Continue reading

Letter: Everyone wins if St. Clair is chosen to be commissioner

Editor, Ahoy there over on Whidbey. I am over here, on the… Continue reading

Letter: Shake hands with the devil and you may end up in bed

Editor, Like millions of other people here in the United States and… Continue reading

Letter: Oak Harbor needs pool for recreation, exercise

Editor, I would like to personally thank all the people who are… Continue reading

Letter: So excited to get ‘back into the swim of things’

Editor, I am so excited. Because of the hard work and generous… Continue reading

Letter: There were other qualified candidates

Editor, A Supreme Court appointment is a lifetime appointment. To rush through… Continue reading

Letter: Kavanaugh’s statements misleading

Editor, Gulping water like a cornered rat, Brett Kavanaugh yelled that the… Continue reading

Letter: Read measure, then cast your vote against it

Editor, I’m never surprised by the things the Piazzons will say in… Continue reading

Most Read