What’s not said can have as much impact in news story

Editor,

I was somewhat confused by the Whidbey News-Times’ July 22 Publisher’s Column. But I do not have a college degree in English so it is not a great task to confuse me with double talk. He uses phrases like “fake news” and “alternative facts.”

Who is releasing these “fakes news” and “alternative facts?” Was he trying to point a finger at the federal government or the local media? The ability to release “fake news” is not a skill reserved to anyone.

A member of Congress or local government wants to put the blame on the other party so he releases only a few “facts,” just enough to cover his own rear end, and pass the buck to others. Or is it the editor who does not print the “whole” story?

Most of us know from watching TV shows that a person in court takes an oath to “tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.” That oath only applies to the court room. The media are not bound by those rules.

For a long time I have used the following to illustrate my point. Elections are coming up and I want to run for animal control officer. The reporter, or editor, wants a personal friend to fill that slot. One day I am walking my dog in the park. As usual I carry a poop scoop, plastic bag and paper towel, just in case my dog has to go. I meet the reporter and we have a few words about what a nice day it is, how the Mariners did in last night’s game and a couple other pleasantries. As I depart my dog decides he has to do his thing. Using my scoop, I pick up his deposits and place them in my plastic bag and deposit it into the park garbage can, as required.

The next edition of the paper there is an article about me walking my dog, meeting with the reporter for a few minutes and the actions of my dog as we depart.

He did not mention the clean up. In big print the story asks if this is the person you want for animal control officer. He did not say I left the dog’s deposit on the park grounds, but by ignoring what point it was implied I had.

I could not sue the reporter for a false story as the words he used were true, the words he did not use created “fake news.” The media, as well as officials, are well-qualified to misguide the public.

Words used by the media can be true, but the words they do not use can change the story.

Robert Brown

Oak Harbor

More in Letters to the Editor

Banning all guns isn’t the answer to mass shootings

Editor, In reply to Sharron Gray’s Feb. 10 letter to the editor,… Continue reading

‘Fringe group’ seeks base closure, not compatibility

Editor, Citizens of Ebey’s Reserve and other fringe groups have expanded their… Continue reading

Thank you for urging responsible climate change action

Editor, Thank you for your editorial urging responsible action in confronting climate… Continue reading

Irony in Navy, civillian responses to security

Editor, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island just concluded a two-week drill which… Continue reading

Roundabout isn’t safe solution to traffic

Editor, Washington State Department of Transportation has not put traffic counters on… Continue reading

State should follow county in banning fish net pens

Editor, I want to take a moment to express my appreciation to… Continue reading

Appreciate community’s thoughts, prayers after death

Editor, We would like to thank all the friends and family that… Continue reading

Prosperity, greatness does not meet Dem’s agenda

Prosperity, greatness does not meet Democratic agenda

Grateful for community’s support in time of grief

Editor, Once again, I must thank the community for their consideration during… Continue reading

Most Read