Need to lobby legislature to keep net neutrality

Editor,

Ready to send more money to your internet service provider (ISP)? Good. The Federal Communications Commission under their new leader, Ajit Pai, plans to remove net neutrality protections by Dec. 14.

Net neutrality means that ISPs can’t charge more money to access particular sites or services. Net neutrality means that the ISP can’t censor content. Net neutrality means that small businesses, videographers and musicians can’t be charged just to access their audience.

No net neutrality means AT&T could stop access to a service as they did in 2012 and 2013 to Apple’s FaceTime — until sued under net neutrality rules. No net neutrality means if Comcast wanted to, they could slow down your Netflix access like they did in 2014 until coerced using net neutrality rules. No net neutrality means that your internet habits can be sold. No net neutrality means that the board of directors for your ISP will determine what you access, how fast you access and how much you pay to access the internet based upon the best interests of their corporation.

Mr. Pai’s last job was as a Verizon lobbyist. You might be forgiven if you think he is still working for them. Of course, Verizon, Comcast, Charter and AT&T are pushing this roll-back and say they will act responsibly.

In the future if your connections are slow, or a website seems to be down, perhaps it is just your ISP’s “policy.” And of course sending more money to your ISP might fix that. You could call the ISP’s customer service desk. You’ve always had good luck with that, haven’t you? Or you might email your legislator now…while you still can.

Bill Rick

Coupeville

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Citizens’ job is to ensure elected representativs are doing theirs

Editor, Is the southern border situation a national emergency or a tempest… Continue reading

Letter: Volunteers for treasurer’s office are invaluable at tax time

Editor, The Island County Treasurer’s Office wishes to extend its annual thanks… Continue reading

Letter: Writer’s information is propaganda, not facts

Editor, In your Dec. 26, 2018 edition of the Whidbey News-Times, you… Continue reading

Letter: Distract, don’t talk about investigation, is a strategy

Editor, I believe President Trump nailed it when he said he prefers… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Angel lady’ who turned in lost purse new best friend

Editor, In early December, I had a quick errand at Walmart, parked… Continue reading

Letter: COER shouldn’t be able to hijack Section 106 process

Editor, Citizens of Ebey’s Reserve, or COER, has hijacked the Section 106… Continue reading

Letter: Disheartened by editorial cartoon on Trump, his wall

Editor, It was disheartening that, when I opened the Whidbey News-Times Saturday,… Continue reading

Letter: Storm should have been front, center on page one

Editor, It is obvious where the Whidbey News-Times’ priorities are when the… Continue reading

Letter: League of Women Voters, AAUW legislative brunch open to public

Editor, Much has been said about the renewed interest in government in… Continue reading

Most Read