Letter: Navy seeking comments on nonexisting agreement

Editor,

A Memorandum of Agreement, or MOA, means acceptance or endorsement.

Unfortunately, the Draft MOA released by the Navy to the local newspaper was none of these. None of the consulting partners listed in the Navy’s release agreed to the document as presented to the public. Its publication was a total surprise.

For months, the Navy asked for a public meeting on the historic properties affected by the Section 106 Growler Expansion Plan. Multiple requests from all levels of leadership in our state have been met with silence. The end result — no public meeting, as is required by this federal process — has taken place.

Without a public meeting process there is no way the public can understand what a MOA is or the purpose of a Section 106. This is the Navy’s responsibility. Sending people to a website is insufficient as compared with the impacts of the proposed effect. Asking the pubic to comment on a Memorandum of Agreement that has not been agreed upon is a totally false note.

This recent action demonstrates an ongoing lack of understanding from Washington, D.C of its military decisions and the incremental impact of those decisions on Northwest Washington state.

This brings us closer to an impasse that should be as unacceptable to the Navy and the Department of Defense as it is to the local community. We must keep asking for better results for a Memorandum of Agreement and a better record of decision that provides a respectful and sustainable outcome for Whidbey Island and Northwest Washington.

Northwest Washington communities have been partners with the military in protecting our national security. The latest proposals by the DOD dramatically increase the number of Growler jets and flights — putting us all at risk.

It’s time we stand up for our communities. It is time to say no new jets, no new flights. For information, go to sounddefensealliance.org online.

Patrick Hurley

Coupeville

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Outcomes show WAIF is employing best practices

Editor, To address some misunderstandings in the article published Jan. 9, as… Continue reading

Letter: Marvel, ooze patriotism at beauty, power of Growlers

Editor, In September 1940, the sounds of friendly aircraft over London were… Continue reading

Letter: Japanese understand impact of Navy jet noise

Editor, The Jan. 9, 2019 edition of The Asahi Shimbun News reports… Continue reading

Letter: Description of crime was unnecessary, damaging

Editor, Regarding the Jan. 16, 2019 article, “Man kills his ex-girlfriend, calls… Continue reading

Letter: Citizens’ job is to ensure elected representativs are doing theirs

Editor, Is the southern border situation a national emergency or a tempest… Continue reading

Letter: Volunteers for treasurer’s office are invaluable at tax time

Editor, The Island County Treasurer’s Office wishes to extend its annual thanks… Continue reading

Letter: Distract, don’t talk about investigation, is a strategy

Editor, I believe President Trump nailed it when he said he prefers… Continue reading

Letter: Storm should have been front, center on page one

Editor, It is obvious where the Whidbey News-Times’ priorities are when the… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Angel lady’ who turned in lost purse new best friend

Editor, In early December, I had a quick errand at Walmart, parked… Continue reading

Letter: Writer’s information is propaganda, not facts

Editor, In your Dec. 26, 2018 edition of the Whidbey News-Times, you… Continue reading

Letter: League of Women Voters, AAUW legislative brunch open to public

Editor, Much has been said about the renewed interest in government in… Continue reading

Letter: Disheartened by editorial cartoon on Trump, his wall

Editor, It was disheartening that, when I opened the Whidbey News-Times Saturday,… Continue reading