Letter: Fasten your seatbelts, hang on to checkbooks


We all recently received our Notice of Value from Island County Assessor Mary Engle. Included with this notice, a slip of yellow paper explains, “The legislature requires identification of land and improvements separately on assessment notices, however, only the total assessed value should be considered and based on state law only the total assessed value may be appealed.”

This is something new for this year and it is not correct. It is based on misinterpreted precedence of case law; specifically University Village v King County, 2001.

This case deals only with the income method of real property assessment which is mainly applicable to some commercial properties.

The state Board of Tax Appeals initiated this misinterpretation recently to simplify their administrative procedures.

Justice it is not.

When I called the county Assessor’s Office, the deputy assessor explained that the assessor’s valuation total was accurate, but that improvement valuations were assessed too low and land assessments too high. Why did my land value increase by 20 percent from last year?

All of my neighbors have land values in increments of $50,000. Is that an indication of the lack of accuracy in land assessments?

I have emailed our newest state legislator Rep. Dave Paul with the hope that he can request a state attorney general opinion to clarify interpretation of University Village v King County.

Assessment of Island County real property is far too simplistic and, therefore, inaccurate. When I asked to meet with Engle, the response was, “The assessor’s value is accurate.”

There was no agreement to meet.

There is no adjustment to land values for view quality, orientation, parcel size and encumbrance restrictions, such as wetland or eagle habitat, off-site septic, Navy aircraft noise, paved driveway, extensive landscaping, gazebo, as well as other attributes that we all realize influence market value.

Appraisal methodology is required to be in writing and transparent to the public. It is neither.

We just re-elected Engle, who ran unopposed. Fasten your seatbelts and hang on to your checkbooks.

Tim Verschuyl

Oak Harbor

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Greenbank Progressive Club is back ‘home,’ come and see

Editor, The Greenbank Progressive Club is back home in our clubhouse and… Continue reading

Letter: Navy League uninterested in facts, science, solutions

Editor, It’s bad news for this community and our region that the… Continue reading

Rockin’ a Hard Place: Balkanizing the Rock: What distrust may lead to

I’m just back from a dream trip along the coast of Slovenia… Continue reading

Letter: Growlers were designed to be loud, to be heard by all

Editor, We hear it all the time. We have the best military… Continue reading

Letter: How can one not notice our changing climate?

Editor, Mr. Gunther, thank you for your letter to the editor of… Continue reading

Letter: Many helped to make 2019 garden tour a huge success

Editor, The Oak Harbor Garden Club would like to thank those in… Continue reading

Letter: Another reason why Island County area is so healthy

Editor, Unrecognized too often are the special people who go the extra… Continue reading

Letter: Apparent effort to silence opposition ‘anti-American’

Editor, To whomever has been stealing the anti-Growler yards signs in Coupeville,… Continue reading

Letter: State should use taxation system akin to California’s

Editor, On Proposition 13, the California property tax revolt of 1978 —… Continue reading

Most Read