Letter: Claims by local Growler opponents easily debunked

Editor,

The Jan. 18, “Japanese understand impact of Navy jet noise” letter is not factual.

In reality, the Japanese FCLP relocation underscores the importance of OLF Coupeville on several levels.

That letter is easily debunked, and here’s how:

• Like nearly every local activists’ contention, such as the Growler being louder than the Prowler — not true — property devaluation — Central Whidbey is up 50 percent since 2014.

• Health issues — rejected by the courts — business reduction. Valuations are strong based on objective appraisals), and jet impact on wildlife, like many military installations, Naval Air Station Whidbey and OLF Coupeville are fully abundant with wildlife.

FCLPs are not being relocated from Iwojima to Mageshima Island, “in response to Japanese citizen noise complaints on Iwojima,” as the letter asserts.

Actually, civilian access to Iwojima is severely restricted and the island is almost entirely uninhabited, apart from military personnel.

Flight carrier landing practices began on Iwojima in 1991. This was intended to be temporary until a more suitable location could be found.

Practice there incurs added operational risk and original/alternate locations impact urban populations.

The three decade search shows the uncommon rarity of suitable carrier landing settings, for which the 75-year-old Coupeville practice field is possibly the finest in the world.

The author’s claim, which is persistently echoed by activists, that “the military already owns little-used airfields in remote areas where FCLPs could be practiced today,” is without merit.

Those contrived remote locations are fully utilized and at high elevations.

Training for aircraft carrier landings must be accomplished in representative settings, at sea level, like the new Japanese island.

Similar to OLF Coupeville, Mageshima Island accentuates the Navy’s awareness of noise concerns.

Both locations show a conscientious desire to balance the unique needs of naval aviation risk management with the impact of loud jets, while also ensuring the defense of the U.S. and our allies.

Since 1902, the nonpartisan Navy League is committed to informing the American people and their government concerning the importance of strong sea services.

Steve Bristow

President, Oak Harbor Navy League

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: What’s all of this talk about global warming?

Editor, Over the last few days, Mother Nature has made me realize… Continue reading

Letter: State of New York going too far with abortion law

Editor, I have been chewing on this for a while. We must… Continue reading

Letter: Tale of two walls: ‘Sorrow, anger, fear’ and ‘power’

Editor, Following are some thoughts of sorrow, anger, fear, power to share… Continue reading

Letter: Letter writer got many of his border facts wrong

Editor, In a letter to the editor published on Wednesday, Feb. 20,… Continue reading

Letter: Alternative, safe vaccines withheld by ‘big pharma’

Editor, House Bill 1638 mandates the removal of “religious and personal exemptions… Continue reading

Letter: Security of this nation’s borders must be a priority

Editor, We have a very serious problem in our country created by… Continue reading

Letter: Former state treasurer is going against our citizens

Editor, Former State Treasurer Duane A. Davidson is opposed to the citizens… Continue reading

Letter: Wondering if the Navy has problem with credibility

Editor, The Navy Growler EIS makes dubious assertions, as well as verbal… Continue reading

Letter: Exposure to jet noise may have damaging effects

Editor, Noise exposure from military jets has long been shown to cause… Continue reading

Most Read