Letter: Citizens of Ebey’s Reserve gets OLF facts all wrong


Again, we need to clear up some typical Citizens of Ebey’s Reserve (COER) and Coupeville Community Allies (CCA) talking points that are completely false. Their lies are going to be targeted by a naval aviation expert rather than anecdotal and falsely extrapolated claims.

COER does not speak for the pilots, nor do they have any knowledge of aviation safety. They do not decide what is safe and what is not. Professional pilots will make that decision.

First, both groups have repeatedly stated that OLF Coupeville is too short for pilot safety. This is completely false.

Fact is, OLF Coupeville is 5,400 feet long and has an operational waiver. The reason is, there are no full-stop landings at OLF Coupeville.

The landing area of an aircraft carrier is approximately 900 feet. We can and routinely perform touch-and-go landings in about 300 feet. One might hypothetically ask, “What if a jet needed to full stop at OLF Coupeville?”

OLF Coupeville has bi-directional arresting gear located at the mid-field point so, in the event of emergency, an aircraft could easily land at OLF Coupeville with its hook down and use the arresting gear to stop in about 900 feet. Otherwise, it’s much easier to simply return to NAS Whidbey to full stop. There is no risk to pilot safety. Aviators use arresting gear all the time, which is why it’s installed on every runway at NAS Whidbey, OLF Coupeville, most military airfields, and many civilian airfields like Portland International.

The pattern for runway 14 is too tight for the ground speed of the EA-18G aircraft. As part of the EIS process, the Navy will simply redraw the pattern to be wider to accommodate the EA-18Gs higher ground speed. It’s a very simple solution. As a result, flight patterns will be distributed between runways 32 and 14 based on wind direction. The pattern can and will be redrawn very easily.

In summary, every time a claim get published, it’s going to be countered by experts and professional aviators. Point for point, these myths will be dispelled publicly.

I have flown professionally as a military pilot in the F/A-18C, E, F, EA-18G, and F-16. I have been a civilian aviator for more than 25 years. I am an expert. My friends at NAS Whidbey are experts. COER and CCA are not. They have no credibility in this field, and we will fight them at every turn.

You don’t speak for us, so stop claiming you’re concerned for our safety. You will not be allowed to speak for the pilots. You speak for yourselves only.

Roger Dietrich

Oak Harbor

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Has the Navy looked at impact on Sound’s orcas?

Editor, Knowing how deeply the increase in OLF flights off Central Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Oak Harbor Key Club’s Trivia Night is nearing

Editor, I am writing this letter in regards to our First Annual… Continue reading

Letter: Democracy depends on exercising right to vote

Editor, Tuesday, Sept. 25 is National Voter Registration Day. Across the nation,… Continue reading

Letter: Sharpe’s Corner a job well done

Editor, There was a good bit of opposition when the Washington State… Continue reading

Letter: A poor design for the big trucks

Editor, As one who spoke up against the roundabout traffic circle plans,… Continue reading

Letter: Letter writer is not an expert, Navy is

Editor, I think the U.S. Navy knows a bit more about the… Continue reading

Letter: Reasons are many to go see ‘Daddy Long Legs’

Editor, My husband and I greatly enjoyed the current production at Whidbey… Continue reading

Letter: Please help to re-open city’s swimming pool

Editor, It’s beyond embarrassing that a city the size of Oak Harbor… Continue reading

Letter: Growler noise will turn Coupeville a ghost town

Editor, I love living in Coupeville. My daughter thrives in school. It’s… Continue reading

Most Read