Is no vote really good planning?

Editor,

The planning commission voted on Monday to say no to Wrights Crossing after hearing public comment and the persuasive comments from staff. This vote simply says we do not want to hear any more discussion, nor do we wish to accept the offer from Wrights Crossing of an EIS, a comprehensive traffic study and a new BLA to either confirm, complete or contradict the 2016 BLA that all agree has some flaws, and to what degree is at question.

Emotional attachments to the beauty of the island were expressed well by conservationists. A few concerns were the protection of our forests, our farms, our water.

The studies that were proposed would help identify the risk and method of conservation. Would it be better not to plan and to remove our forest five acres at a time at five acres per house?

And for the farming, if it were a viable farm, why did another farmer not step up to buy a working farm? As for the water, if the property remains a farm, where agriculture requires 92 percent of our water footprint, this could use much more of this precious resource, and the houses will still be built within an acceptable area of the jobs, so still drawing from the same Skagit River. Seems we won’t be saving any water.

There was discussion of profiteering. It was stated that very few building permits were issued in Oak Harbor in 2016. With such a housing shortage why so few?

Could it be that it is not cost effective to build and sell? Economies of scale might be a good solution that could provide the much needed housing. And what value would 1,500 households generating $50,000 – $75,000 per year in to our economy be to Oak Harbor?

There are many good points for discussion; the planning commission just voted to say no to any further study or discussion. Is this really good planning?

Leo Mitchell

Oak Harbor

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: St. Clair has right skills to be elected commissioner

Editor, Janet St. Clair demonstrated that she is well prepared to be… Continue reading

Letter: I-1639 would put data, 2nd Amendment, at risk

Editor, Vote “no” on Initiative 1639. Did you know that I-1639 allows… Continue reading

Letter: Everyone wins if St. Clair is chosen to be commissioner

Editor, Ahoy there over on Whidbey. I am over here, on the… Continue reading

Letter: Shake hands with the devil and you may end up in bed

Editor, Like millions of other people here in the United States and… Continue reading

Letter: Oak Harbor needs pool for recreation, exercise

Editor, I would like to personally thank all the people who are… Continue reading

Letter: So excited to get ‘back into the swim of things’

Editor, I am so excited. Because of the hard work and generous… Continue reading

Letter: There were other qualified candidates

Editor, A Supreme Court appointment is a lifetime appointment. To rush through… Continue reading

Letter: Kavanaugh’s statements misleading

Editor, Gulping water like a cornered rat, Brett Kavanaugh yelled that the… Continue reading

Letter: Read measure, then cast your vote against it

Editor, I’m never surprised by the things the Piazzons will say in… Continue reading

Most Read