Is no vote really good planning?

Editor,

The planning commission voted on Monday to say no to Wrights Crossing after hearing public comment and the persuasive comments from staff. This vote simply says we do not want to hear any more discussion, nor do we wish to accept the offer from Wrights Crossing of an EIS, a comprehensive traffic study and a new BLA to either confirm, complete or contradict the 2016 BLA that all agree has some flaws, and to what degree is at question.

Emotional attachments to the beauty of the island were expressed well by conservationists. A few concerns were the protection of our forests, our farms, our water.

The studies that were proposed would help identify the risk and method of conservation. Would it be better not to plan and to remove our forest five acres at a time at five acres per house?

And for the farming, if it were a viable farm, why did another farmer not step up to buy a working farm? As for the water, if the property remains a farm, where agriculture requires 92 percent of our water footprint, this could use much more of this precious resource, and the houses will still be built within an acceptable area of the jobs, so still drawing from the same Skagit River. Seems we won’t be saving any water.

There was discussion of profiteering. It was stated that very few building permits were issued in Oak Harbor in 2016. With such a housing shortage why so few?

Could it be that it is not cost effective to build and sell? Economies of scale might be a good solution that could provide the much needed housing. And what value would 1,500 households generating $50,000 – $75,000 per year in to our economy be to Oak Harbor?

There are many good points for discussion; the planning commission just voted to say no to any further study or discussion. Is this really good planning?

Leo Mitchell

Oak Harbor

More in Letters to the Editor

Letter: Japanese understand impact of Navy jet noise

Editor, The Jan. 9, 2019 edition of The Asahi Shimbun News reports… Continue reading

Letter: Description of crime was unnecessary, damaging

Editor, Regarding the Jan. 16, 2019 article, “Man kills his ex-girlfriend, calls… Continue reading

Letter: Citizens’ job is to ensure elected representativs are doing theirs

Editor, Is the southern border situation a national emergency or a tempest… Continue reading

Letter: Volunteers for treasurer’s office are invaluable at tax time

Editor, The Island County Treasurer’s Office wishes to extend its annual thanks… Continue reading

Letter: Writer’s information is propaganda, not facts

Editor, In your Dec. 26, 2018 edition of the Whidbey News-Times, you… Continue reading

Letter: Distract, don’t talk about investigation, is a strategy

Editor, I believe President Trump nailed it when he said he prefers… Continue reading

Letter: ‘Angel lady’ who turned in lost purse new best friend

Editor, In early December, I had a quick errand at Walmart, parked… Continue reading

Letter: Storm should have been front, center on page one

Editor, It is obvious where the Whidbey News-Times’ priorities are when the… Continue reading

Letter: League of Women Voters, AAUW legislative brunch open to public

Editor, Much has been said about the renewed interest in government in… Continue reading

Most Read