Don’t use pollution control to justify climate change ‘hoax’

Editor,

In response to Mr. Sheldon’s June 21 letter, I am providing a reference to the climate change citation he requests.

Google search “Kyoto University/UC San Diego Study.”

It states that solar activity was the only force powerful enough to explain the climate change results they measured.

In other words, the completely mundane explanation is that the sun can burn hotter and cooler over long periods of time and those changes are responsible for periods of drought and wetness.

To quote an American Liberty report, “An independent review of published science under the Obama Administration fully explains the narrative you have heard so often. During Obama’s eight years, climate models that showed catastrophic trends received more funding that their conservative counterparts.

“In fact, any report showing extreme and immediate danger was four times more likely to receive additional funding than anything else, and the amount of funding correlated with the extremity of the findings.

Simply put, government money was used to purchase science showing the results they needed to justify policy.”

I am not against pollution control.

Everybody wants clean air and water, but using it to justify climate change is a hoax.

Ed Hickey

Oak Harbor